contact us

new business

Katie McGrath



Carrie Muehlemann


general inquiry

Terri French



Terms & Conditions

Ownership: This site is protected by U.S. and international copyright and trademark laws and any copy, display or retransmission of the contents of this site is strictly prohibited. Any ads or other examples of our work displayed on our site are provided solely for self-promotional, business-to-business purposes for the exclusive use of our clients, prospects and employees, and are not intended for the casual viewing or entertainment purposes of the public. We explicitly forbid the downloading, copying or re-purposing or any text, audio, visual, programming or design materials without our written consent.

Privacy Policy: We will not collect personally identifiable information from you without your permission. We shall treat any information you send to us as non-confidential and non-proprietary and we cannot guarantee or warrant the security of any data you submit to us. However, we will use reasonable efforts to treat as confidential any e-mails, resumes, applications or inquiries sent to us for purpose of seeking information or for inquiring into potential employment with us, in accordance with our employment policies. Any e-mail, resume or submission you send to us will be used only for internal purposes. Please be aware that submission of your resume or application may not be considered and we are under no obligation to respond to such solicitations. We are an equal opportunity employer.

Unsolicited Materials: It is our policy not to accept or consider unsolicited creative, production related or other ideas of any kind. Please do not send any artwork, jingles, slogans or campaign ideas. The sole purpose of this policy is to avoid potential misunderstandings or disputes when our campaigns or advertising might seem similar to ideas submitted to us. If you submit an idea or materials despite our above request, you agree that such submission becomes our property and we are free to use it without compensation or credit to you. We make no assurances that your ideas will be treated as confidential.

Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability: We make no representations or warranties of any kind as to: (a) the accuracy or completeness of the information or materials on the site and assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions in its content; (b) the availability for use of any copyrighted, trademarked or proprietary materials of third parties that may appear in this site; (c) computer viruses or other bugs that third parties may embed in or attach to this site without our knowledge or consent; (d) any software made available for downloading, copying or other use through this site; or (e) the merchantability, fitness for use, title and/or non-infringement of any or all of the contents of this site. WE SHALL NOT HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT, STATUTE OR OTHERWISE) FOR ANY COSTS, LOSSES, DAMAGES (WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT, COMPENSATORY, SPECIAL, LOST PROFITS, LIQUIDATED, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE YOUR ACCESS TO, BROWSING OF OR USE OF THIS SITE OR ANY OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS SITE.

Links To Third Party Sites: The sites to which links are provided to you for convenience only and are not under our control. We do not assume any responsibility for the contents of any linked site or any privacy practices employed by other sites. The existence of a link between this site and any other site should not be construed as an endorsement by either us or the owner or proprietor of the linked site to the other.

We reserve the right to change these terms and conditions at any time.


Recent Posts


Recent Authors


RT Aims Small - Small Business Week 2015

We're part of a city that's driven by small business. And we consider ourselves small business experts. We have to be - we're a voice for the small-but-mighty business owners just as our clients are for them. But we've committed to challenge ourselves further to better understand our community-loved cohorts, especially with an appropriate week on the calendar: National Small Business Week.

Inspired by an RT employee, Sam, and her husband, Adam, who have pledged to shop small every day for the entire year, we've pledged to frequent only our beloved small businesses the week of May 4 through 10 - Small Business Week. We'll be reporting our experiences so we can share the results through all RT social channels and as well as an in-depth survey app on our phones. Our thoughts and conclusions will be shared in our Thinking Small newsletter, a monthly email curated for small businesses and the clients that serve them.

Our challenge requires no hassle, simply more one-on-one interactions, a greater sense of adventure and an exploration into parts of our communities we've never before sought out. A latte crafted from coffee beans hand-picked by a local roaster. A repair shop where the owner is happy to talk you through what he did to avoid the problem next time. A sandwich served with tomatoes harvested from a restaurant's backyard garden. A music venue showcasing a local band's first appearance.

In addition to celebrating Small Business Saturday this year, we want to observe "Small Business Every Day", both in our work and our lives. We encourage others to support the backbones of their cities, just as we're caring for ours. A city of small businesses that do sleep, but only because they've worked so hard all day. And dream of the opportunities tomorrow.

To see how Sam and Adam have been shopping small this year, check out their Instagram account, @livelocalstl. And watch RT's Facebook page all week where we'll be showcasing our Small Business Week journey. And on Twitter, follow #AIMSML and #DreamSmallBiz for updates. Let us know if you'll be taking the challenge, too - there's enough local craft beer for all of us.

The Art and Science of Bold Decision Making

Making decisions is tough for me.

I don't think it was always the case. But the older I get, the more responsibility that lands on my plate, and the larger the array of choices that are available to me, the harder it is for me to commit.

Last week I had another opportunity to attend five intensive, information-packed days at SXSW in Austin. Unlike other conferences, if you've been to SX, you know that you need to have a good plan before your arrive. With the inherent pressure of your company spending a significant amount of money for you to attend, over 6,000 available sessions at your disposal, competing with more than 30,000 people for seats and only so many hours in the day, you are forced to make some tough decisions.

According to multiple sources on the Internet, the average amount of remotely conscious decisions an adult makes each day equals about 35,000. That's a lot. Lately I've seen several articles detailing the science of simplicity and how some of the most prolific people in history (Einstein, Jobs, Obama) choose to eliminate trivial decisions from their daily lives (like what to wear and what to eat) so they can reserve their best thinking for higher impact decisions.

While in Austin, I was fortunate to hear Phil Libin, the CEO of Evernote, share some profound thoughts on the topic of the Art of Bold Decision Making.

Phil spoke in not-so-scientific terms about the difference between our Amygdala (the brain center focused on fight or flight decision making) vs. the Neocortex (the part of our brain that's focused on emotion and higher-level decision making). It turns out that we are all by nature pre-disposed to think first with our Amygdala. This makes sense if you think about it. We're wired for basic survival instincts. A decision on where to forge a river or which berry to eat could have fatal consequences. The challenge comes when we use that same part of our brain to make higher-level strategic decisions.

For instance, when presented with strategic choices, it is not uncommon for companies to look at a list of pros and cons in front of them and to choose the opportunity with the least downside.

A&S of Decision Making 1

A&S of Decision Making 2

The trouble here is that we fail to think fully about the true upside of the opportunity in front of us when we submit our thinking only to our Amygdyla.

The Negativity Bias is a practical theory that is easy to observe in human behavior. If you think about it, when we sit in meetings we are more likely to hear negative feedback because it makes people sound smarter. Positive statements tend to be seen as naïve or lacking sound judgment. Because we're wired to first think about all the possibilities of what could go wrong, our "flight" reflex sadly yields a larger amount of mediocre decisions.  We end up with "The Least Bad" decision.

What's interesting in this same decision making model is the potential outcome if we change how we ask the question.  Looking first at the option with the greatest upside may have a radically different effect.

A&S of Decision Making 3

Take for instance Henry Ford's epic decision in 1914 to double the wages of his workers. In increasingly tough economic conditions and having built a business around some of the most efficient practices of the modern era, Ford was at the peak of his success. The problem was that his employee turnover was also very high.  In today's economy, when a business is radically successful they want to keep the momentum going. They don't decide to do things like double wages and cut work hours for their employees. But that's exactly what Ford did. The upside that Ford understood was that if he could keep workers around longer and give them the means to actually be able to afford the car they were producing, they would be more invested in the company culture and ultimately be happier, more productive workers. 100 years later, Ford still employs one of the most loyal work forces on the planet.

Being in the business of ideas, I've had a front row seat on more than one occasion to see well-meaning people take great and bold ideas and whittle them down to safe and mediocre. While I understand the immense daily pressures of wanting to "get it right," I think we need to be stronger and more disciplined about retraining our decision making process.

The old adage that the best coaches "don't play to lose, they play to win" couldn't be truer.

While there is certainly merit to understanding the pros and cons of any decision, I'm sure we all have plenty of room for improvement.

For now, I'm going to try and be more disciplined to spend less time on the downsides and more time asking, "What if it's great?"